Andy Constan Dismisses Fears Over Nvidia's 'Circular Deals'
Andy Constan, CEO of Damped Spring Advisors, stated on X that concerns over Nvidia's 'circular deals' collapsing due to leadership issues are 'complete nonsense.'
Andy Constan, CEO of Damped Spring Advisors, addressed concerns surrounding “circular deals” linked to Nvidia and its leadership on X on Thursday, November 12, 2026.
Constan's comments come during recent market focus on Nvidia, with its stock, NVDA, trading at $173.73 today, up 2.9%.
Constan's view implies that the primary risk to these financing structures is not corporate governance or leadership stability within Nvidia itself.
Andy Constan, CEO of Damped Spring Advisors, addressed concerns surrounding “circular deals” linked to Nvidia and its leadership on X on Thursday, November 12, 2026. Constan specifically dismissed fears that existing or future deals would collapse if Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang were forced out due to financial instability or a lack of leadership. He stated that this particular concern is “complete nonsense imho.” Constan emphasized that the fundamental question for these deals is not about Nvidia's internal stability but rather “What matters for current and future "circular deals" is the same thing that has always mattered. Will end customers of AI services pay a price for the services and consume enough of the services to pay off the credit created in the system. That's the question and it's unanswered.”
Constan's comments come during recent market focus on Nvidia, with its stock, NVDA, trading at $173.73 today, up 2.9%. Earlier today, The Kobeissi Letter reported that markets were paring back bets on Jensen Huang being fired. Gokhshtein Media recently covered OpenAI's API revenue surge, highlighting the economics of renting frontier models, which relates to the demand for AI services.
Constan's view implies that the primary risk to these financing structures is not corporate governance or leadership stability within Nvidia itself. Instead, he suggests that investors should monitor the willingness and ability of end-users to pay for AI services. The long-term viability of these deals, according to Constan, hinges on the actual economic demand for AI-driven solutions.
“I've written many many pages on 'circular' deals. My largest DSR is in comments on the topic The topic is a shiny object generally and more specifically today it's super shiny. The shiny part is that Jensen's troubles will result in the circular deals collapsing. There is some justification for concern but I see it having two aspects. 1. Has $NVDA been compromised more deeply than Jensen's affairs and potential personal national security issues and the entire organization is corrupt and the financing deals and their terms are not disclosed or accounted for properly. In other words NVDA is Enron. I doubt this because Enron dealt in money and derivatives and NVDA ships chips that get used. But it's possible I guess. Independent directors need to clean house to restore confidence 2. The existing deals will collapse and future deals will collapse when Jensen is forced out due to financial instability at NVDA and lack of leadership who can make deals. This one is complete nonsense imho. While an important and central credit creator (the AIG of chips) NVDA isn't the only source of credit if the price is right and the risk is okay. What matters for current and future 'circular deals' is the same thing that has always mattered. Will end customers of AI services pay a price for the services and consume enough of the services to pay off the credit created in the system. That's the question and it's unanswered.”
The Gokhshtein Media Voices Desk covers what the people who move markets are saying — statements, predictions, and reactions from notable investors, founders, and policymakers. About this desk →